Southwestern Ontario Media Forum

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



January 29, 2016 10:50 AM  #1


Driving a Tesla: no AM radio

If AM radio didn't have enough to to worry about....

I got to drive a Tesla. Interesting is that they don't have AM radios.  Apparently the battery makes AM reception impossible. 

Does the Prius have AM?

 

January 29, 2016 10:59 AM  #2


Re: Driving a Tesla: no AM radio

OMG! The angry white guys at that other site will read this and lose their combined entrails! Now they'll wax on and on about how you're wrong and radio isn't the same as it was at the turn of some century. Then they'll mash up words like Bell, Rogers and Corus and equate them with the Great Satan. They'll note profits, corporations and progress is equal to an alien invasion involving probing without lubrication. Then there will be some obligatory tripe about Freddie Vette, Chum, the Waters family and classic RB from when teletypes were used. But, much like a shiny object, they'll get distracted with the next obit. It's always such a shock when someone in their 80s dies, isn't it?! Thanks for giving them another day to pound their dashboards. 

 

January 31, 2016 8:53 PM  #3


Re: Driving a Tesla: no AM radio

Almost all public companies = Great Satan.  When your priority is shareholders over customers you lack an understanding of capitalism.  The individuals paying for a service are ALWAYS more important than nameless, faceless "owners".  It works like this.

1. Customer
2. Staff (good staff make happy customers)
3. Shareholders. 

The Tesla is a beautiful car AND there are charging stations which allow me to travel to Vancouver (my federal masters are in Burnaby).  So travel would, in theory, be free as the charging stations are free.  Unfortunately the cars are too expensive especially with the dollar.

But gas is 69 cents anyway!



 

     Thread Starter
 

January 31, 2016 9:17 PM  #4


Re: Driving a Tesla: no AM radio

Do you own RSPs? Guess what? You're a shareholder in many of these "evil" companies. I'm sorry, but I'm a capitalist and believe in profit for my investments. If some numbered employee loses their livelihood, that's the game.

I invest in companies for a return on investment, not because I'm a benevolent guy wanting to hire people.

I've been in the business long enough to be laid off, downsized, rebranded, etc to know that I'm a mere cog in a larger wheel. I don't whine or moan and blame the number crunchers. Nor do I wax endlessly posting about how things were better when. I move on, reinvent and clutch my sh!t until it's time to push.

 

January 31, 2016 11:46 PM  #5


Re: Driving a Tesla: no AM radio

I have RSP's Fausto. Not a single one has any investments in stocks of any companies.  I own "no stocks".  I'm told all too frequently by "investment people" in the know I'm making a mistake.  I could earn so much more if I just....

If I really wanted a return on my investment wouldn't it make more sense for me to involve myself with organized crime?  Do you imagine that a politician or 1% business type is somehow more ethical than the leader of some organized crime syndicate?  The only real difference is how they paint the picture & convince the masses.  Is the drug dealer back in my old 'hood any less ethical than the guy who bought out a pharma company & raised the prices of an AIDS/cancer drug by 5000%. 

I believe in capitalism.  All in all it's an efficient system that allows those with motivation to shine.  But this isn't capitalism bud.  This is a twisted form of mercantile-ism where corporate power buys political support. 

As for the numbered employee, well what's to say that's not going to be you sometime?  I am highly skilled with just 2 things in life.  Computer security and guns.  What if we build a system based on those pillars? A system where I can easily commandeer a computer, upload stolen child porn on it & then have the individual arrested.  Don't kid yourself, that happens. 

If you build a dog eat dog system, you will have winners and losers.  You seem to imagine all the winners are somehow "good folks" or that it's just business.  El Chapo, the leader of the Sinaloa drug cartel was a hard working capitalist..

There is a blurred line between good and bad Fausto. You can't be a little big pregnant.  What is that line? Where does integrity start & stop? 

Last edited by Hathaway (February 1, 2016 12:01 AM)

     Thread Starter
 

February 1, 2016 12:12 AM  #6


Re: Driving a Tesla: no AM radio

I have been that "numbered employee" many times in my career; it's the nature of the business. I knew about it going in. And, yet, I still invest in the very companies that whacked me because it's smart business that they're turning profit.

Much like not being "a little bit pregnant",  I don't believe you can only partially believe in capitalism. Part of that is to make a profit at all LEGAL costs. (I write "legal" because equating this debate with crime lords is a bit of a journey). My immediate debate is how some view corporations that own media as automatically soulless, heartless devils. It amuses me to no end when I read comments from jocks being canned due to restructuring and they moan they are owed a living "just because". Whenever there is a mass canning in media, people put on their pity pants and cry crocodile tears about the injustice. Yet, when a hospital nukes RNs or a car company closes a line, there isn't the same pathetic public spanking.

You know what I'm referring to -- the recent CHCH "massacre" or any mic jockey after a rebrand and the strawberry clouds come out and label the bean counters as the next Fuhrer. 

​BTW, I would tend to agree with those "investment people". Inasmuch as I don't second-guess my surgeon about how I would perform my heart procedure, perhaps a bond of trust could be formed with your own advisors?  

 

February 1, 2016 7:59 AM  #7


Re: Driving a Tesla: no AM radio

Equating it with crime lords isn't a bit of a journey. It's just an extreme example. Mostly.  But for you to imagine that somehow people don't cross the line knowingly is .. well .. naive.  Industrial espionage is rather commonplace.  Then there are those who manipulate social media to cause gyrations in the stock market & profit. And companies regularly do "penetration testing" and "social engineering" on their own staff but will do surveillance on rivals in the hopes of using the information for extortion and intimidation. Sound legal to you?

Some time back I had a Financial executive invite me out to have a chat.  Off the record.  Official business but off the record.  The individual was concerned because some person online was talking shit about the company.  I gathered the shit was a little bit too close to the truth.  The task at hand was way outside of my boundaries (and illegal).  Very illegal.  Of course I declined but there will be others who do not. There are lots of them.  You don't have to break a guys bones to take him down and ruin his life. 

The "legal line" is often very blurred.

As for the investment people I'm aware they're professionals & they're right. But I'm not interested. Do I need more money? Is the sum total of the game acquiring as much as possible?  I simply have no interest in supporting the concept.  I have one long term goal dude.  To get off the grid.  And stay off.  That's my retirement.  It can't come soon enough.

     Thread Starter
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum